Motor learning is a complex and continuous process consisting of several phases. The margins between the phases are usually not clear. The basis of motor learning is a specific motor programme, which is created by the motor cortex based on external and internal information. The essence of efficient motor learning in sport is a correct notion of movement. In the case of beginners, the notion of movement is vague, incomplete, sometimes even wrong and not in harmony with the real dynamic and temporal parameters of movement technique. The use of motor learning methods depends on the athlete's biological and calendar age, foreknowledge, motor experience, and the information he has on movement. Attention has to be focused primarily on the causes of incorrect movement, and not their consequences. The most common causes of irrational movement are incorrect notions, a lack of motor abilities and an unfavourable morphological constitution of the athlete.
1. Adams, J. (1976). Issues for a closed-loop theory of motor learning. In Stelmach, G. E.: Motor Control (87-107). New York: Academic Press.
2. Abernethy, B., Kippers, V., Mackinnon, L., Neal, R., & Hanrahm, S. (1997). The Biophysical Foundations of Human Movement. Champaign IL: Human Kinetics.
3. Bompa, T. (1999). Periodization, Theory and Methodology of Training. Champaign IL: Human Kinetics, P.O. Box 5076.
4. Bouchard, C., Barry, D., McPherson, D., Taylor, A. (1992). Physical Activity Sciences. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, P.O. Box 5076. Motor Learning in Sport 59 5. Enoka, R. (1998). Neuromechanical Basics of Kinesiology. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, P.O. Box 5076. 6. Glyn, R. (1992). Motivation in Sport and Exercise. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Books, P.O. Box, IW 14. 7. Harre, D. (1982). Trainingslehre. Berlin: Sportverlag. 8. Hay, J. (1985). The Biomechanics of Sport Techniques. Prentice-Hall, Inc. Englewood Cliffs. 9. Horst, A. (1985). Skiing Right. PSIA, Inc. USA. 10. Keele, S., & Summers, J. (1976). The structure of motor programs. In Stelmach, G. E.: Motor Control (109-142). New York: Academic Press. 11. Latash, M. (1998). Progress in Motor Control – Bernstein's Traditions in Movement Studies. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, P.O. Box 5076. 12. Magill, R. (1993). Motor Learning: Concepts and Applications. 3rd. Ed. Madison: WCB Brown & Benchmark. 13. Marentič-Požarnik, B. (1980). Dejavniki in metode uspešnega učenja (Factors and methods of successful learning). Ljubljana.: DU Univerzum. 14. Marentič-Požarnik, B. (2000). Psihologija učenja in pouka (Psychology learning in lesson). Ljubljana: DZS. 15. Marjanovič-Umek L., Zupančič, M., Fekonja, U., Kavčič, T., Svetina, M., Tomazo, T., Ravnik, T., & Bratanič, B. (2004). Razvojna psihologija (Psychology of development). Ljubljana: Rokus. 16. Piek, J. (1998). Motor Behaviour and Human Skill. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, P.O. Box. 17. Schmidt, R. (1976). The schema as a solution to some persistent problems in motor learning theory. In Stelmach, G. E.: Motor Control (41-65). New York: Academic Press. 18. Schmidt, R. (1976). The search for invariance in skilled movement behaviour. Research Quarterly 2 (56),188-200. 19. Schmidt, R. (1977). Schema Theory –Implication for Movement Education. Motor Skills – Theory and Practice, 2. 20. Schmidt, R. (1991). Motor Learning & Performance. Champaign Il.: Human Kinetics Books. 21. Singer, R. (1981). Task classification and strategy utilization in motor skills. Research Quarterly 1 (52), 100-116. 22. Tancig, S. (1996). Razlage psihomotoričnega učenja. Teorija motoričnega programa, teorija sheme in neopiagetova teorija (Phases of psychomotor learning, Theory of motor program, theory of schema in neo Piaget's theory). Psihološka obzorja 4, 105-116.
Contact person: Anna
E-mail: wisdomlongkeji@163.com
Cellphone: +0086-13534205279